Monday is Scrabble
day. My grandson and I hole up for a
couple of hours at a local coffee shop for serious word competition. Well, perhaps I’m overstating … friendly,
word building is a more accurate description.
After setting up the board, we went to the counter. The owner smiled, “Hi, ready for your game? You two want the usual? Hot Chocolate with marshmallows?” (He’s got us down. We are what you would call: regulars.)
Scrabble between
us began this past fall and, as I said, I made sure my grandson knew that vocabulary
building is the intent. During the first
couple months he played open dictionary – this variant, dictionary use, was my
idea and I thought using it would keep him on a level playing field. I recall
those first few games me saying: Let’s
not worry about who wins. We’ll go for
improving our personal score each week.
Deal?
I thought he agreed.
Me, I babbled away in a kindly fashion about how fun it would be to play
for the joy of making words and improving. I went as far to discuss with him
sportsmanship, like if he drew a challenging combination of letters. In fact, in the beginning games, we
strategized together instead of staring blankly at a rack of lackluster tiles,
for example: iiiiooe – boo hiss.
About 30 minutes into this past Monday’s game, an employee
stops by our table, chatting us up a bit.
Who’s winning? Every week, someone asks that question: Who is winning? Why does everything have to be about winning?
I humbly adjusted my halo, “Oh we play to improve our
vocabulary … the score doesn’t matter.” I
offered a smile. How could anyone expect a twelve year old to beat an ole Scrabble fan like me?
Glancing over at Jax, I noticed he was studying his letters not even aware that a question
was asked. And, he was taking a long time with his play.
“Do you want me to look at your letters?” I asked sweetly.
“Do you want me to look at your letters?” I asked sweetly.
“No, I want to figure it out myself.”
“Well, remember, you can use the dictionary if you want.”
“No, I’m okay.”
He reorganized the tiles several times on his rack. Stopped, then bit his upper lip suppressing a
smile. He gleefully contained his excitement, then looked at me,
smiled full out and plunked down the word:
perkish. The “k” covered a double
letter, the “h” on a triple word and also joined to the word “ut” at the right
angle forming “hut” – yes, another triple word.
And, since he used all seven letters, a 50 point bonus was allowed.
Arrgh … my back straightened.
“Perkish? Is that a
word … perkish?” I was taken
back at the play.
“Well, if you are perky then can’t you be sort of perky?” We
locked eyeballs, “That would be perkish,” he stated in a matter of fact tone.
I grabbed the dictionary.
Yes, I know we are playing for fun but … what kind of derivative of
perky is that?
Here is the answer to that question: perkish is not in Webster’s nor Oxford
Dictionaries (I know this because later that evening, I looked it up at home –
and, yes, I recognize what this act states about me; don’t remind me) BUT, it
is in the Scrabble Dictionary. And, according to Scrabble, a person can be sort of perky.
I added up his score: 131 points. I added it again … are you kidding me? 131 points.
I also lost my next turn for questioning the move and being proved
wrong.
“Well, Grandma,” he smiled, “at least you improved your
vocabulary.”
“You are so not using a dictionary for help ever again,” I
mumbled as I earnestly scrutinized my next play.
“I didn’t use the dictionary,” he said quietly as he pulled
seven letters from the black felt bag.
His final score:
414. Yes, 414!
Vocabulary be damned. (The halo is not remotely near me and likely
never has been.) Yes, the Susan guidelines
have officially changed. Monday’s game
will no longer be “sort of” anything to do with me demurely correcting folks who
ask about the score.
Oh, I forgot to mention that the coffee shop also serves
beer and wine … could become my new “regular” order. Hmm, I’ll have to
remember that: “regular” is a seven letter word. I could place the “g” on a triple letter space and the "r" on a triple word square, and receive the 50 point bonus. A perkish move, wouldn’t
you say?
(A final note: I have
had to hit the ignore key six times when spell checking this article.)
I have a record of 110 games played against one opponent. Her highest score in all those games was 414. He must be a smart kid.
ReplyDeleteShe has bettered that score since the 414. And yes, he is a thoughtful, bright kid.
ReplyDelete